The Artificial Sugar Conspiracy - Stevia
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 at 01:28PM
Stevia. Most people probably haven’t heard of it. Stevia is a genus of about 240 species of herbs and shrubs in the sunflower family (Asteraceae), native to subtropical and tropical South America and Central America. The species Stevia rebaudiana, commonly known as sweetleaf, sweet leaf, sugarleaf, or simply stevia, is widely grown for its sweet leaves. As a sweetener and sugar substitute, stevia’s taste has a slower onset and longer duration than that of sugar, although some of its extracts may have a bitter or licorice-like aftertaste at high concentrations.
With its extracts having up to 300 times the sweetness of sugar, stevia has garnered attention with the rise in demand for low-carbohydrate, low-sugar food alternatives. Medical research has also shown possible benefits of stevia in treating obesity and high blood pressure. Because stevia has a negligible effect on blood glucose, it is attractive as a natural sweetener to people on carbohydrate-controlled diets. However, health and political controversies have limited stevia’s availability in many countries; for example, the United States banned it in the early 1990s unless labeled as a supplement.
The question to ask is: Why it was banned unless labeled as a supplement by the US FDA? Is it because it’s potentially harmful to humans? In reality, stevia is natural and non-toxic. Compared to nutra-sweet or Splenda which are both derived through a chemical process, it’s actually much healthier for you.
In 1991, when the FDA labeled the plant as an “unsafe additive,” it restricted the import of stevia. This brought on much controversy that brought up questions of whether the FDA acted on results from empirical data that stevia was “inadequate to demonstrate its safety,” or if it was pressure from lobbyists in the artificial sweetener industry. Most likely we all have our opinions on that!
Well guess what…last year the FDA lifted the restriction and stevia can now be used as an additive. Wow, just when you thought our government did not act in the best interest of the people they TOTALLY redeem themselves…or NOT.
The real reason the restriction was lifted is not because they find that it’s in the best interest of public health. Forget that there is this all-natural product that grows from the ground that could be used as a sugar substitute rather than using nasty chemicals that we are finding cause an array of symptoms. Instead, what really pushed them to make the change…COCA COLA. That’s right folks. The beverage giant pushed and the government tipped over.
At least the soda giants took a turn for the better **applause**:
In December 2008, the FDA gave a “no objection” approval for GRAS status to Truvia (developed by Cargill and The Coca-Cola Company) and PureVia (developed by PepsiCo and the Whole Earth Sweetener Company, a subsidiary of Merisant), both of which are wholly-derived from the Stevia plant.
additives,
artificial sweetener,
coca-cola,
fda,
stevia,
sugar,
supplement in
Business,
Politics,
culture 



Reader Comments (5)
The brands available this year in the USA are bitter and horrible in comparison. Could it be that they don't WANT people to prefer the taste of Stevia (so they sell bitter versions), since it might threaten the sugar and existing sweetener markets??
I hope in future it will be far more widely known and accepted and marketed.
Great blog by the way - I'm your newest follower!
I guess that if I have that much money at that time to hire the labs to perform the tests, the American consumers whoucl have been enjoying the benefits of this safe natural sweetner for for than 20 years... What a shame!!!
For more information about how FDA has blocked stevia in this country for the last two decades go to www.stevitastevia.com and chick on FDA vs. Stevita.. FDA even ordered stevia books to be burned!
Anyway i also have a blog about blood pressure too. Come visit me sometimes.^_^
http://www.bloodpressuresuggest.com/